Essay-AW-Q75 Online Services
Semester: Summer 2016 (C16)
Module Code: EAPI3002
Module Title: English for Academic Purposes 1 (EAP 1)
Programme: BSc – Extended Programme – Year 0
Awarding Body: University of Plymouth
Module Leader: Venetia Tzanni
Format: Essay
Any special requirements: All written work should be submitted on the Student Portal along with a Turnitin Report
Word Limit: 1,000 words – plus or minus 10% (not including reference list)
Deadline date for submission: 09 / 08 / 2016 (week 10)
Learning outcomes to be examined in this assessment: Produce a well-organised and coherent researched essay
Percentage of marks awarded for module This assignment is worth 40% of the marks for the module
Assessment criteria: Explanatory comments: Maximum marks for each section
Task Fulfilment
Relevant content, well-developed ideas and good organisation and structure
40%
Use of Sources
A range of sources, integrated effectively and referenced using the Harvard system
30%
Use of English
Accurate use and a wide range of grammar/vocabulary
30%
Procedure
1. Do some general reading and research to choose a topic.
• Access the collection of sources related to the theme of ‘The UK Education System’ which can be found in the ‘Assignment Information’ section of the EAP 1 GSM Learn page and read any source you consider relevant to your topic.
• Choose another country and research information on its education system.
• Choose a topic, depending on your interests and information available.
2. Make notes of the similarities and differences you can identify.
• Note down the characteristics of the primary or secondary or higher education system you have found in your sources.
• Decide which 2-3 areas you would like to focus your discussion on, depending on the information you have found (e.g. funding? structure? subjects taught? et.c.).
• Identify similarities and differences in relation to those areas.
3. Prepare an essay outline.
• An essay outline is a plan of what you will write in your essay and how you will organise that content. It is useful for organising your thoughts and avoiding the risk of addressing irrelevant points while writing.
• You can show your outline to your lecturer and ask for feedback in weeks 4 and 5.
4. Write a 1,000 word essay comparing the education systems in the two countries.
The coursework should follow the structural requirements of a compare and contrast essay. This means you should include the following
Introduction
• Background information on education
• More specific information on the education system in the two countries
• A thesis statement explaining the outline of your essay and your position (e.g. which system is more effective?)
You can read more about our case study assignment help services here.
How it Works
How It works ?
Step 1:- Click on Submit your Assignment here or shown in left side corner of every page and fill the quotation form with all the details. In the comment section, please mention Case Id mentioned in end of every Q&A Page. You can also send us your details through our email id support@assignmentconsultancy.com with Case Id in the email body. Case Id is essential to locate your questions so please mentioned that in your email or submit your quotes form comment section.
Step 2:- While filling submit your quotes form please fill all details like deadline date, expected budget, topic , your comments in addition to Case Id . The date is asked to provide deadline.
Step 3:- Once we received your assignments through submit your quotes form or email, we will review the Questions and notify our price through our email id. Kindly ensure that our email id assignmentconsultancy.help@gmail.com and support@assignmentconcultancy.com must not go into your spam folders. We request you to provide your expected budget as it will help us in negotiating with our experts.
Step 4:- Once you agreed with our price, kindly pay by clicking on Pay Now and please ensure that while entering your credit card details for making payment, it must be done correctly and address should be your credit card billing address. You can also request for invoice to our live chat representatives.
Step 5:- Once we received the payment we will notify through our email and will deliver the Q&A solution through mail as per agreed upon deadline.
Step 6:-You can also call us in our phone no. as given in the top of the home page or chat with our customer service representatives by clicking on chat now given in the bottom right corner.
Case Approach
Scientific Methodology
We use best scientific approach to solve case study as recommended and designed by best professors and experts in the World. The approach followed by our experts are given below:
Defining Problem
The first step in solving any case study analysis is to define its problem carefully. In order to do this step, our experts read the case two three times so as to define problem carefully and accurately. This step acts as a base and help in building the structure in next steps.
Structure Definition
The second step is to define structure to solve the case. Different cases has different requirements and so as the structure. Our experts understand this and follow student;s university guidelines to come out with best structure so that student will receive best mark for the same.
Research and Analysis
This is the most important step which actually defines the strength of any case analysis. In order to provide best case analysis, our experts not only refer case materials but also outside materials if required to come out with best analysis for the case.
Conclusion & Recommendations
A weak conclusion or recommendations spoil the entire case analysis. Our expert know this and always provide good chunks of volume for this part so that instructors will see the effort put by students in arriving at solution so as to provide best mark.
Related Services
- Physics Assignment Help
- Chemistry Assignment Help
- Engineering Assignment Help
- Psychology Assignment Help
- Online exam Help
- Marketing Assignment Help
- Arts Assignment Help
- Sociology Assignment Help
- Project Management Assignment
- Case Study Help
- Nursing Assignment Help
- Research Assignment Help
- Operations Management Assignment help
- Accounting Assignment Help
- Biology Assignment Help
- Mathematics Assignment Help
- English Assignment Help
- Business Plan Help
- Essay Writing Help
- Human Resource Assignment Help
- Accounting Homework Help
- Computer Science Assignment Help
- Finance Assignment Help
- Economics Assignment Help
- Statistics Homework Help
- Management Assignment Help
- Strategy Management Assignment Help
- Auditing Assignment Help
- Information Management Assignment Help
- Online Assignment Writing help
- Humanities Assignment help
- Taxation Homework Help
- Corporate Finance Assignment Help
- Financial Management Assignment Help
Main body paragraphs (3-4 paragraphs)
In each of them you should
• Include a topic sentence explaining the focus of the particular paragraph
• Discuss BOTH countries in relation to ONE area (e.g. funding, structure et.c.)
• Provide evidence (references), examples and evaluation of each similarity or difference (e.g. why is it important?)
Conclusion
• Summarise the main points of your essay
• State which system is more effective and why
• Add a few suggestions / recommendations
References
• A list of detailed references you used in your essay, in alphabetical order
5. Proof-read and edit your essay very carefully before submission.
• No headings or table of contents are needed.
• Modify the title so that it reflects the content of your essay.
• Use at least four sources to support your ideas.
• Make sure that your sources are reliable.
• Make sure that you have referenced your sources appropriately.
You can show a draft of your work to your lecturer in week 7. Speak to your tutor about their preferred format (email or hard copy). They will look at your draft and give guidance for the final draft. Drafts do not need to be submitted through Turnitin.
Failure to submit your essay by the deadline will result in your grade being capped.
Preparation for the essay will start in class from week one. In order to receive guidance and support from your lecturer, it is VITAL that you attend all sessions. Failure to attend classes will result in you not having the necessary building blocks of information, advice and instruction to be able to complete the task successfully. Please use GSM Learn for lecture notes and/or video support if you miss classes or need additional support.
COURSEWORK ESSAYS MARKING CRITERIA
30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+
Task Fulfilment (Have you answered the question?)
you have included relevant, ideas and content the overall message is hard to follow
ideas often irrelevant
the task requirements are not met
the overall message may be unclear in places or lack focus
ideas may be irrelevant or poorly argued
the requirements of the task are minimally met
• the overall message is identifiable but not always clear, focussed or fluent
• ideas not always relevant
• the requirements of the task are mainly but not fully met
• the overall message is mostly focused, clear and fluent
• ideas usually relevant
the requirements of the task are satisfactorily covered; some elements may be dealt with better than others the overall message is focused, clear and fluent
ideas relevant
the requirements of the task are fully covered
Module example: In this section we are looking for an argument essay title based on your degree; the essay needs to be an compare and contrast essay of 1,000 words; you need to include relevant comparisons and it needs to make sense (have you included irrelevant information etc.?).
you develop your ideas well ideas often undeveloped; ideas may be inappropriately and/or insufficiently supported or connected
there is very little or no detail or complexity
no evaluation and analysis; ideas may be very simple, and mostly descriptive
ideas not adequately supported with reasons, evidence, examples or details
there is little detail or complexity
little evaluation and analysis; but there may be some explanation or opinion, mainly descriptive
ideas not always sufficiently well-developed and clarified; most ideas usually supported with reasons, evidence, examples or details
complex topics/ ideas are expressed but the level of detail is limited
some evaluation included, but may be largely descriptive and/or somewhat lacking in analysis
ideas usually adequately developed and supported with appropriate evidence, examples or details; however, there may be occasional lack of focus and/or relevance
complex topics/ideas are expressed adequately with some detail but supporting detail could be further developed
some analysis and evaluation is included • ideas well-developed and clarified with appropriate evidence, examples or explanation; good elaboration in well constructed paragraphs
• complex topics/ideas are well-structured and most relevant issues are expressed effectively
• analysis and evaluation is included
Module example In this section we are looking for some depth to your argument. Have you just written a descriptive piece giving your opinion on a topic or have you researched and supported your ideas in depth with evidence and examples. To achieve a higher grade you would demonstrate critical thinking skills here.
30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+
Task Fulfilment continued (Have you answered the question?)
you use good organisation; you structure your paragraphs well and they link together
organisation at whole-text and paragraph level hindered by inadequate linguistic resources
ideas are unclear and not logical
use of organisational structures lacking
some evidence of organisation at whole-text and paragraph level, though many parts may lack coherence; significant ideas may not be easily identifiable or lack a clearly defined focus
links between ideas are unclear and not always logical
rare use of organisational structures at whole text and paragraph level
evidence of organisation at whole-text and paragraph level, though some parts may lack coherence; significant ideas may lack a clearly defined focus
links between ideas are not always clear and logical
inconsistent use of organisational structures at whole text and paragraph level
coherent and logical organisation at whole text and paragraph level; though occasional lapses are possible; most significant ideas are identifiable
links between ideas mostly clear and logical
controlled use of organisational structures at whole text and paragraph level
coherent and logical organisation at whole text and paragraph level; significant ideas identifiable
links between ideas clear and logical
well- controlled use of organisational structures at whole-text and paragraph level
Module example: In this section we are looking to see an introduction, 3 body paragraphs and a conclusion. Your structure should follow a point-by-point style and each paragraph should contain a number of comparisons, connected using linking words. The links between paragraph should also be logical and easy to follow (coherent).
Use of Sources (How well have you used sources?)
you have used a range of suitable sources as support
extremely limited range (number and variety / under-reliance) and suitability of sources used as evidence and support for arguments made;
OR extremely heavy reliance on sources (including use of quotation) at expense of author’s own writing;
OR no sources are used • very limited range (number and variety / under-reliance) and suitability of sources used as evidence and support for arguments made;
• OR heavy reliance on sources (including use of quotation) at expense of author’s own writing
• limited range (number and variety) and suitability of sources used as evidence and support for arguments made;
• OR some over-reliance on sources (including use of quotation) at expense of author’s own writing
• good range (number and variety) and suitability of sources used as evidence and support for arguments made
• very good range (number and variety) and suitability of sources used as evidence and support for arguments made
Module example: Have you backed up your ideas and arguments with evidence/ sources? Have you used a number of different sources? Have you paraphrased and/or summarised and shown other’s opinions to back up what you are saying?
30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+
your in-text citation and list of references follow academic convention • little or no control of in-text citation and bibliographical referencing skills
• does not adhere to academic conventions; important features are inaccurate or missing
• or no in-text citation and/or bibliographic referencing is included • very little control of in-text citation and bibliographical referencing skills
• does not adhere to academic conventions; important features are inaccurate or missing
• inconsistent control of in-text citation and bibliographical referencing skills,
• does not always adhere to academic conventions; important features may be inaccurate or missing
• generally proficient control of in-text citation and bibliographical referencing skills
• usually adheres to academic conventions; some minor features may be inaccurate or missing
• mostly proficient control of in-text citation and bibliographical referencing skills
• adheres to academic conventions
Module example: In this section you need include in-text referencing (within your paragraphs) for example: “According to Smith (2014) ……” or “It is argued that ………………….. (Irving, 2012)” , and you reference list should follow Harvard style
Use of Sources continued (How well have you used sources?)
you have integrated sources effectively without plagiarising extremely limited or no attempt to paraphrase and summarise
very few or no changes have been made to original lexis and structure
ability to integrate quotations with own style and syntax is not evident
clear evidence of poor academic practice or plagiarism *
• little or no attempt to paraphrase and summarise
• minimal changes have been made to original lexis and structure
• ability to integrate quotations with own style and syntax is not evident
• evidence of poor academic practice or plagiarism*
• some attempts to paraphrase and summarise
• insufficient changes have been made to original lexis and structure
• a little evidence of ability to integrate quotations with own style and syntax
• good attempts to paraphrase and summarise
• original author’s meaning for the most part well-conveyed
• some evidence of ability to integrate quotations with own style and syntax
• very good paraphrases and summaries
• author’s original meaning well-conveyed
• writer has integrated quotations well with her/his style and syntax
Module example: Here you need to integrate other authors’/ experts’ opinions into your paragraphs using paraphrasing and/or summarising skills
30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+
Use of English (What is your written English like?)
your grammar/vocabulary is accurate errors cause strain; confusion and incorrect word choice occur in high items; noticeable collocation errors
word formation and spelling errors may seriously inhibit intelligibility
errors often cause strain; confusion and incorrect word choice occur in high and low frequency items; noticeable collocation errors
frequent word formation and spelling errors often inhibit intelligibility
errors occasionally cause strain; some confusion and incorrect word choice may occur, especially in low frequency items; there may be collocation errors
frequent word formation and spelling error s occasionally inhibit intelligibility
errors only cause slight strain; some confusion and incorrect word choice may occur, especially in low frequency items
occasional spelling and word formation lapses do not inhibit intelligibility
no significant errors; but occasional minor slips
good control over word formation and spelling
you use a wide range of grammar/vocabulary
lexical range limited to low pre-intermediate/ elementary, high frequency vocabulary; vocabulary not adequate for an academic task
very restricted use of vocabulary: sufficient for the expression only of basic communicative needs
lexical range limited to low intermediate/ pre-intermediate, higher frequency vocabulary; vocabulary may not be adequate for an academic task
very restricted use of vocabulary: noticeable inaccuracy and inappropriacy when dealing with general ideas or unfamiliar topics
• lexical range limited to intermediate, higher frequency vocabulary; vocabulary may not be adequate for an academic task
restricted use of vocabulary: noticeable inaccuracy and inappropriacy when dealing with complex ideas or unfamiliar topics
good lexical range for the task
• appropriate use of vocabulary but lexical/collocation/idiomatic gaps sometimes obvious
broad lexical range
fluent, mostly correct and appropriate use of vocabulary including: collocation, accurate low frequency items and idiomatic expressions though with some gaps
Module example: In this section you need to show that your vocabulary is academic in style (formal written language) and specific to your topic. Proofread to ensure you don’t have spelling mistakes or grammar errors
Product Code -Essay-AW-Q75
Looking for best Essay-AW-Q75 online,please click here