# Finance-AW-Q158

## Finance-AW-Q158 Online Services

Section 1 – Technical questions

Question 1 – Cash flows

Peak Oil Services plc (POS) is the sole owner of J Block, located in the Central Basin of the North Sea. This is a complex multi-layered structure, with original reserves of 110 million barrels of oil, on which production started in 2004.

The historic and estimated future oil production, associated costs, and the economic parameters are as follows (all monetary figures are given in constant £2015)

Oil production Capex
103 bopd £2015 m
2000 30
2001 235
2002
285
2003 180.5
2004 47.8 14.5
2005 48 32
2006 33.8 32
2007 28
2008 24.5
2009 28
2010 21
2011 17
2012 13.5
2013 11
2014 9
2015 7.5
2016 6.5
2017 4
2018 3
2019 100

Opex consists of two components, a fixed and a variable component

 The fixed component is £20155 m per annum.
 The variable component is £2015 2 per barrel, including export costs.

Corporation tax rate is 62%, payable fully in the year it is due. There is no other form of tax and the field is taxed on a consolidated basis. Capital allowances are 100% allowable in the year in which they arise.

For evaluation purposes, the oil price is assumed to be £201535 per barrel. Inflation is constant at 2% throughout the life of the project.

(i) POS were offered £2015150m for J Block in late June 2012. Assuming the appropriate discount rate for the J Block project to be 10%, calculate the NPV[0.10] of the project at that date and discuss whether POS were correct to decline this offer.
(15 %)

(ii) Assume it is now mid-2015. POS are currently considering a workover to reduce water production, which would also permit incremental oil recovery (extra to the original production estimates) as given in the table below. Based on this table and the further information below (all monetary figures are given in constant £2015), would you advise
POS to proceed with the workover?

You can read more about our case study assignment help services here.

## How it Works

#### How It works ?

Step 1:- Click on Submit your Assignment here or shown in left side corner of every page and fill the quotation form with all the details. In the comment section, please mention Case Id mentioned in end of every Q&A Page. You can also send us your details through our email id support@assignmentconsultancy.com with Case Id in the email body. Case Id is essential to locate your questions so please mentioned that in your email or submit your quotes form comment section.

Step 3:- Once we received your assignments through submit your quotes form or email, we will review the Questions and notify our price through our email id. Kindly ensure that our email id assignmentconsultancy.help@gmail.com and support@assignmentconcultancy.com must not go into your spam folders. We request you to provide your expected budget as it will help us in negotiating with our experts.

Step 4:- Once you agreed with our price, kindly pay by clicking on Pay Now and please ensure that while entering your credit card details for making payment, it must be done correctly and address should be your credit card billing address. You can also request for invoice to our live chat representatives.

Step 5:- Once we received the payment we will notify through our email and will deliver the Q&A solution through mail as per agreed upon deadline.

Step 6:-You can also call us in our phone no. as given in the top of the home page or chat with our customer service representatives by clicking on chat now given in the bottom right corner.

## Case Approach

#### Scientific Methodology

We use best scientific approach to solve case study as recommended and designed by best professors and experts in the World. The approach followed by our experts are given below:

Defining Problem

The first step in solving any case study analysis is to define its problem carefully. In order to do this step, our experts read the case two three times so as to define problem carefully and accurately. This step acts as a base and help in building the structure in next steps.

Structure Definition

The second step is to define structure to solve the case. Different cases has different requirements and so as the structure. Our experts understand this and follow student;s university guidelines to come out with best structure so that student will receive best mark for the same.

Research and Analysis

This is the most important step which actually defines the strength of any case analysis. In order to provide best case analysis, our experts not only refer case materials but also outside materials if required to come out with best analysis for the case.

Conclusion & Recommendations

A weak conclusion or recommendations spoil the entire case analysis. Our expert know this and always provide good chunks of volume for this part so that instructors will see the effort put by students in arriving at solution so as to provide best mark.

## Related Services

 The capex for the workover is expected to be £2015 25 m in 2015.
 The abandonment capex is estimated to rise by £2015 10 m.
 The abandonment date will be delayed by one year to 2020.
 The increase in fixed opex brought about by the workover is estimated to be
£2015 1 m per year.
 The appropriate real discount rate for the workover is 15%.

Incremental oil
production
103 bopd
2016 2
2017 1.5
2018 1.5
2019 1
(10 %)
(Total 25%)

Question 3 – Tree diagram

Fisher Oil Ltd is an oil exploration company with a preliminary drilling license in a certain small acreage. The company currently faces the following three possibilities

a. carry out the drilling itself,
b. farm-out the drilling, or
c. sell the licence to another operator (assuming this is possible).

If Fisher Oil carries out the drilling it will incur \$3 million for drilling the first well, which based on current information maybe a dry hole with probability 45%, a marginal producer with probability 35%, or a good producer with probability 20%. In that acreage a marginal producer is estimated to bring in \$5 million in revenue, and a good producer \$8 million in revenue.

If the first testing well turns out to be a dry hole, then the company may choose to abandon or,alternatively, acquire 2D seismic information for part of the acreage and drill a second well accordingly at a total cost of \$4.5 million. Although the 2D seismic information is assumed perfect in revealing a structure if it is present, due to possible migration this structure is likely to be a good producer with probability 60%, a marginal producer with probability 30% or a dry hole with probability 10%. However, in this seismic assisted case, and only in this case, better recovery management means that a marginal producer will most likely bring in \$7 million in revenue, and a good producer \$10 million.

Fisher Oil may instead farm out the licence acreage to a more specialised company whereby it
receives 30% of revenue if the farming effort yields a good producer, 25% of revenue if it is a
marginal producer and 0% if it is a dry hole. The drilling experience of the farmed to specialised company together with the particular knowledge it has in the blocks around the acreage may yield a good producer with a probability of 55%, a marginal producer with a probability of 25% and a dry hole with a probability of 20%. Seismic investigation is not available to the farmed to company.

The third option open to Fisher Oil is to sell the licence now to another operator for \$1.8 million.This option will not be available at a later date.

Assume that all expected revenue figures are expressed as a present value. Answer the following
questions.

(i) Draw a tree diagram that represents the logic and outcomes of this problem and use it to
advise Fisher Oil on the optimal option to follow.

(15 %)

(ii) Compare and contrast the possible risks involved in the three options available to Fisher Oil and discuss how the advice you gave earlier to Fisher Oil in your answer to part(i) should, or should not, be revised or augmented in light of your answer to this question.
(10 %)
(Total 25 %)

Product Code-Finance-AW-Q158