Finance-AW-Q437 Online Services



As you well know by now, Valuation is the central piece in the whole finance profession– from the perspectives of both Investment and trading branches of the field– and if we take valuation out of the discipline, we will not have much to learn from or even talk about. Explain in needed details along with relevant and applicable examples how this Behavioral Finance class helped you to further and expand your knowledge about the whole valuation concept; including b different valuation models and methods.

Be organized in responding.
Maximum pages allowed: three pages, double-space, size12; reference page



Main theme of the present question: Financial Markets and Financial Regulation in the United States:
Applications from my Behavioral Finance Class.

As you can see from the NYT imes article published just three days ago inhere:,regulation of the finance industry is a fact of life for all of us who live in this country;a fact that we may not even want to discuss in our regular conversations with others. However, a fact that makes great question for a classroom like this one where the focus is on application of learned theories and models to real-life problems like the topic of the said piece in the paper.The only thing that I add relative to the article and the below question is this: The article is just an example that is going on in the US economy and you do NOT have to do extra research beyond what you have learned in this class except reading the said article. In other words,answer the question based on what you have learned in this class. (A copy of the piece is added at the end of this exam for your convenience.)

What does Behavioral Finance(BF) have to offer in a debate where the main topic is Financial Markets and Financial Regulation?Focus both on the micro (individual)behavior and the macro (system- wide/economy-wide)behavior. You may submit your writing/response in three parts

A. In Favor of-the part that favors regulation of financial markets,
B. In Opposition to-the part that opposes regulation of financial markets

Be organized in responding.
Maximum pages allowed: four pages, double-space, size12; reference page
You can read more about our case study assignment help services here.

How it Works

How It works ?

Step 1:- Click on Submit your Assignment here or shown in left side corner of every page and fill the quotation form with all the details. In the comment section, please mention Case Id mentioned in end of every Q&A Page. You can also send us your details through our email id with Case Id in the email body. Case Id is essential to locate your questions so please mentioned that in your email or submit your quotes form comment section.

Step 2:- While filling submit your quotes form please fill all details like deadline date, expected budget, topic , your comments in addition to Case Id . The date is asked to provide deadline.

Step 3:- Once we received your assignments through submit your quotes form or email, we will review the Questions and notify our price through our email id. Kindly ensure that our email id and must not go into your spam folders. We request you to provide your expected budget as it will help us in negotiating with our experts.

Step 4:- Once you agreed with our price, kindly pay by clicking on Pay Now and please ensure that while entering your credit card details for making payment, it must be done correctly and address should be your credit card billing address. You can also request for invoice to our live chat representatives.

Step 5:- Once we received the payment we will notify through our email and will deliver the Q&A solution through mail as per agreed upon deadline.

Step 6:-You can also call us in our phone no. as given in the top of the home page or chat with our customer service representatives by clicking on chat now given in the bottom right corner.

Case Approach

Scientific Methodology

We use best scientific approach to solve case study as recommended and designed by best professors and experts in the World. The approach followed by our experts are given below:

Defining Problem

The first step in solving any case study analysis is to define its problem carefully. In order to do this step, our experts read the case two three times so as to define problem carefully and accurately. This step acts as a base and help in building the structure in next steps.

Structure Definition

The second step is to define structure to solve the case. Different cases has different requirements and so as the structure. Our experts understand this and follow student;s university guidelines to come out with best structure so that student will receive best mark for the same.

Research and Analysis

This is the most important step which actually defines the strength of any case analysis. In order to provide best case analysis, our experts not only refer case materials but also outside materials if required to come out with best analysis for the case.

Conclusion & Recommendations

A weak conclusion or recommendations spoil the entire case analysis. Our expert know this and always provide good chunks of volume for this part so that instructors will see the effort put by students in arriving at solution so as to provide best mark.

Related Services



Suppose one of your classmates states the following

“As we all saw from this class, many of the building blocks of the traditional finance theory were questioned and challenged when it came to the relevance of such theory to the problems that investors and managers face in the real world every single day. Building blocks like all the risk definitions and tools; and even the CAPM and CAPM-like models which lie at the heart of the working of financial markets. So I would say there is nothing left of the traditional finance paradigm that we could use to solve problems in the real world!”

How would you respond to the above statements?Do you agree or disagree with the above; and which parts? Explain your thoughts and reasoning in needed details. Make sure you are very clear in the position you take on any key issue.
Be organized in responding. Maximum pages allowed: three pages, double-space, size12; reference page



Federal regulators on Tuesday proposed rules, more than four years in the making, to provide greater consumer protection for retirement savings, requiring a broader group of investment professionals to act in their customers ’best interests when handling their retirement money.

The financial services industry can be am in e field for ordinary investors,who often cannot tell whether their advisers are putting the investors’ interests first; the legal term for this is fiduciary duty. The rules,proposed by the Labor Department, which oversees retirement accounts, are part of the Obamaad ministration’s declared mission to support the middle class.

The proposed rules would eliminate some of the loop holes that allow brokers to avoid acting as fiduciaries when providing advice on retirement money held inside accounts like 401(k)’sand in individual retirement accounts, which hold roughly$7 trillion, as estimated by the Federal Reserve.

The effort is expected to save investors $40 billion over 10years, and that estimate takes into account only some of the conflicts that plague the financial services industry,according to the regulators.
“We want to make sure people get put into products that work best fort hem,” Thomas E. Perez, the secretary of labor, said in a conference call with reporters.“We have met way too many people who have worked their tails off for retirement, they had barely enough saved to begin with, and then they were steered into a product that was unduly complex.”

The new rules would update the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or Erisa, which was enacted in
1974. Then, many retirees relied on pensions and did not have to worry about managing retirement savings. But now, as people are living longer and relying on money from self-directed retirement plans, investors are on their own.
Investors are particularly vulnerable when they roll over the savings they have accumulated in 401(k)-type retirement accounts, which are overseen by their employers, into individual retirement accounts.Brokers who are advising customers on that transaction do not necessarily have to act in the customer’s best interests and may be influenced by higher commissions or other incentives the firm has put in place.

As a result, investors’ money may not end up in the most appropriate investment, potentially costing them thousands of dollars over many decades.In 2012 alone, rollovers to I.R.A.s exceeded $300 billion, and that is expected to rise steadily in the years ahead.

Erisa requires investment professionals to act as fiduciaries when providing advice, but “advice”is defined narrowly. The proposal would expand that fiduciary requirement to include any professional receiving compensation for providing individualized advice,advice to an employer with a retirement plan, workers taking part in those plans and I.R.A. account holders.

“Being a fiduciary simply means that the adviser must provide impartial advice in their client’s best interest and cannot accept any payments creating conflicts of interest unless they qualify for an exemption intended to assure the customer is adequately protected,”regulators said in a statement.Continue reading the main story Continue reading the main story Continue reading the main story

The way some brokers are paid can be riddled with conflicts, and the brokerage industry groups had worried that the rules would upend the way they do business. Brokers will still be allowed to charge commissions and engage in practices known as revenue sharing, in which, for example, a mutual fund company shares aportion of its revenue with the brokerage firm selling the fund; companies that pay more might get a spot on the firm’s list of recommended funds.

While brokers can still get paid in those ways under the new rules, they will be required to enter a contract with customers stating they are putting the investors’ interests first— and disclose any conflicts that may prevent them from doing so. With a contract in hand, dissatisfied investors should have greater recourse. They would most likely still resolve a dispute through arbitration, since nearly all investment firms require investors to agree to settle their disputes that way.

“It is designed to give investors greater ability to use the contract requirement to hold financial professionals accountable,”said Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America. Now that the rule has been announced,regulators will collect comments from the public— industry groups, consumer advocates and others take holders —for75 days.After reviewing the comments, the administration will decide what to include in the final rule.

The Labor Department’s effort has faced strong opposition from the financial services industry, which has argued that the rules would make it too costly to work with smaller investors, or would force brokers to put them into more expensive accounts that charge a percentage of their assets.
Though the Labor Department has been working on the rule for several years— it rescinded its first proposal in 2011 after criticism that it was too aggressive— the effort received broader attention in February,when the Obama administration publicly stated its supported the measure.

Drawing on academic research, the White House has estimated that the lack of investor protection annually costs investors $17 billion, or1 percent of their assets, and perhaps more.
Today, only registered investment advisers are legally required to adhere to the fiduciary standard.If this rule is enacted in the current form, that would be expanded to cover brokers who make recommendations on retirement money. Now they only need to recommend “suitable”investments based on a consumer’s personal situation, taking into account factors like their age, goals and tolerance for risk. That sounds appropriate, but it provides enough leeway for brokers to put customers in investments that generate more profits for the brokers (or their firms)at the customers’ expense.

The Labor Department’s proposal is limited in scope because it applies only to retirement money. Dodd- Frank, the financial regulatory law that went into effect in 2010,gave the Securities and Exchange Commission power to propose a rule that would universally require brokers to act as fiduciaries,even if they are helping with money that is not retirement-related.

The S.E.C. chairwoman,Mary Jo White, recently said she believed her agency should en act a uniform fiduciary duty for broker-dealers and investment advisers.But it is still unclear if she could win the support of
at least two members of the five-member commission— two Republican commissioners have questioned whether it is necessary— and complete the typically long and laborious rule-making process during her tenure.

Product Code-Finance-AW-Q437

Looking for best Finance-AW-Q437 online ,please click here