Law02

Law 02

 
Answer sheet at the bottom of this page. There is only one correct answer to each question.
 
1. Sam orally agreed to sell Ramie some land for $500,000. Ramie paid Sam the $500,000; Sam gave Ramie the deed to the land. Ramie took possession of the land and began building a cabin on it. One month later, Sam tried to retake possession of the land by arguing that the contract for the sale was invalid because it was oral, not written. Sam sued Ramie to invalidate the contract and retake the land.
The court will likely conclude that Sam will:
 
a) Win; the sale exceeded $500 so the contract must be written to be valid.
 
b) Win; all land sales contracts must be written.
 
c) Lose; because the contract was fully executed Sam cannot rescind the contract.
 
d) Lose; because Ramie had begun building a cabin on the property, Sam cannot rescind the contract.
 
2. On Tuesday, Sam offered to sell his CD collection to Sandy for $100. Sandy replied, “I’m interested. I’ll think it over and let you know Thursday whether I want to buy the CDs.” On Wednesday, Sam agreed to sell the CDs to Jason, and Jason immediately gave Sam a letter that stated:
“Sam, I will buy your CD collection for $100. As we agreed, I will pay you on Friday when I pick up the CDs. Yours truly, Jason.”
 
Upon Sam’s receipt of this letter on Wednesday, what best describes Sam’s contract agreement(s)?
 
a) By forming an agreement with Jason, Sam breached his contract with Sandy because he did not effectively revoke his offer to Sandy.
 
b) Sam has formed contracts with both Jason and Sandy because Sam did not effectively revoke his offer to Sandy and created an enforceable written agreement with Jason.
 
c). Sam and Jason have formed a valid, enforceable contract; Sam’s offer to Sandy was properly revoked.
 
d) Sam effectively revoked his offer to Sandy, but has not formed an enforceable contract with Jason because Jason has not yet paid for the CD collection.
 
3. Mac and Rhamad signed a business contract with a clause that provides that if a dispute arises they must submit to binding arbitration to resolve the dispute. After they had been doing business together for a year, a dispute arose under the terms of the contract. Rather than submit to arbitration, Mac filed a lawsuit against Rhamad. Most likely the court will:
 
a) hear the lawsuit because Mac cannot be compelled to submit to arbitration; he is constitutionally entitled to a jury trial if he requests a trial.
 
b) conduct a bench trial, then order a remedy without compelling Mac to submit to arbitration or to a jury trial.
 
c) compel Mac to submit to arbitration to resolve the dispute.
 
d) hear the lawsuit in a trial, then compel Mac to submit to arbitration, if Mac is not satisfied with the trial decision.

 
4. Roxy, while driving through Wyoming to her home in Montana, accidentally lost control of her car and drove it through a window into a store owned by Colt. Colt sued Roxy in a Wyoming court for damages to his store.
Will the Wyoming court likely be able to exercise jurisdiction over Roxy?
 
a) no, because Wyoming has no in personam (personal) jurisdiction over Roxy, and cannot exercise its long arm statute only in cases involving automobile accidents.
 
b) no, because Wyoming has no in personam jurisdiction over Roxy, and cannot justify minimum contacts in this case.
 
c) yes, Wyoming can exercise in personam jurisdiction in this case because any state court has personal jurisdiction in every diversity of citizenship case.
 
d) yes, because Wyoming can assert in personam jurisdiction over Roxy under the minimum contacts test.
 
5. Assume a salesperson intentionally made one of the following statements – knowing that the statement was false – to a customer considering a purchase. Which statement could create liability for fraudulent misrepresentation if the customer made the purchase?
 
a) “In my opinion, this car is in flawless mechanical condition.”
 
b) “This crane will probably lift about 10,000 pounds.”
 
c) “This car is a real gem.”
 
d) “This is an original painting by the artist, Pablo Picasso.”
 
6. Ram was walking down the sidewalk by a construction project site in a downtown area. The project was owned and operated by Modern Construction, Inc. and was surrounded by orange plastic fencing typically used for construction projects. Ram stopped to watch a metal beam being lifted by a crane on the construction site. As the beam swung through the air, Ram thought it was going to fall and jumped forward quickly off the sidewalk and into the construction project property, falling into and smashing the orange plastic fencing. As Ram landed inside the construction project, the beam fell near Ram. The beam did not hit Ram but some rocks were thrown onto Ram as the beam fell, cutting his arm badly so that it required 35 stitches.
If Ram sues Model Construction for negligence, the likely result will be that Ram will:
 
a) Lose, because he assumed the risk as a trespasser on the construction site and trespassers can never recover damages.
 
b) Lose, because pedestrians are always contributorily negligent in such cases involving trespassing.
 
c) Win, because it is always foreseeable that a beam could fall on a rescuing pedestrian.
 
d) Win, if the beam fell because of Model Construction’s negligence.
 
7. Kim carelessly parked her car on a steep hill, leaving the car in neutral and failing to engage the parking brake. The car rolled down the hill and knocked down an electric line. The sparks from the broken line ignited a grass fire that spread to a barn several yards away. The roof of the burning barn fell and damaged a passing car owned by Ray. Can Ray likely recover damages from Kim under ordinary negligence?
 
a) Yes, because Kim was negligent in parking the car.
 
b) Yes, because Kim set in motion the chain of events that resulted in damage to Ray’s car, even though Kim did not directly hit the car.
 
c) No, because of the unforeseeable intervening force doctrine.
 
d) No, regardless of Kim’s negligence in parking the car as her negligence was not the proximate cause of the accident and harm that occurred to Ray.
 
8. Li sued Don in negligence. Li’s losses total $100,000. Under a contributory negligence system, if Li is found to be contributorily negligent for her own injuries, what damages will Li like recover from Don?
a) None.
 
b) $100,000.
 
c) $100,000 minus the percentage of fault (e.g., 20%, 60%, etc.) for which Li was responsible.
 
d) $100,000 minus the percentage of fault for which Li was responsible, so long as Li was not more than 50% responsible for the injuries.
 

9. Don promised to buy his girlfriend, Sophie, a new car so Sophie sold her old car. Don now refuses to buy Sophie the car. Sophie has a job that requires her to have a car to get to work. If Sophie sues Don to enforce the promise, the likely result is that the promise will:
 
a) Be enforced under promissory estoppel because Sophie reasonably relied on Don’s promise, to her detriment.
 
b) Not be enforced as Sophie was not unjustly enriched simply because she did not receive the car.
 
c) Be enforced because the car is a necessity for Sophie and all contracts for necessities are binding and enforceable for all parties even if contract formation is flawed.
 
d) Not be enforced as Don’s promise was a gift to Sophie; Sophie gave consideration, but Don did not.
 
10. X and Y agreed that X would sell Y his small business, including the land on which the business was situated, for $500,000. Both X and Y knew at the time the contract was formed that the business was actually worth $800,000. Is this a valid, enforceable contract?
 
a) Yes, provided the contract was in writing, in accordance with the Statute of Frauds and the parties freely consented.
 
b) Yes, provided the contract was in accordance with state statutory law that permits real estate sales for 40% or more below market value.
 
c) No, because $500,000 is not valid consideration for a business worth $800,000.
 
d) No, because X has no pre-existing legal duty to sell his business.

11. Fine Art Corp. sent a written offer to buy 10,000 pencils for a total of $10,000 from Faber Pencil Co. Both parties are merchants. Faber can accept the offer by:
 
a) Promising to ship the pencils.
 
b) Promptly shipping the pencils.
 
c) Accepting the offer on Faber’s own written standard form contract.
 
d) All of the above could be valid acceptance.
 
12. Ralph, a 16-year old minor, is manager for the high school football team. Ralph signed a contract to purchase alcoholic beverages from Liquormart, Inc. for the team party. This contract is:
 
a) Void as a matter of law because it is illegal to sell alcohol to minors by state law.
 
b) Void only if Ralph misrepresented his age and told Liquormart he was an adult.
 
c) Valid and enforceable, but Ralph has the right to disaffirm because he is a minor.
 
d) Valid and enforceable, if Liquormart knew that Ralph was a minor.
 
13. Which of the following activities may involve the use of a contract, and/or constitute a sales contract?
 
a) Purchasing medications from a pharmacy.
 
b) Hiring a contractor to make home repairs.
 
c) Purchasing insurance policies from an insurance agent.
 
d) Selling books to customers in a bookstore.
 
e) All of the above.
 
14. Fay was admitted to Global Associates, an existing general partnership on January, 2014. In June, 2014, a partnership debt incurred in October, 2013 came due. Fay is:
 
a) Not liable for the debt because the debt was incurred prior to her joining the partnership.
 
b) Only liable for the debt up to the amount of her capital contribution to the partnership.
 
c) Personally liable only for 50% of the total debt if 50% of the other partners do not pay.
 
d) Personally liable for the full extent of the debt if the other partners do not pay.
 
15. Kelly, Lars and Mona agreed to be partners in Neighborhood Deliveries (ND), all splitting the profits equally. Kelly contributed 70% of the capital upon formation of the partnership. Later, the partners agreed to dissolve the partnership as it was not as profitable as they had expected, and its liabilities were greater than its assets.
The losses are paid by:
 
a) All the partners in proportion to their capital contributions.
 
b) All the partners in proportion to their share of the profits.
 
c) Kelly alone because she contributed the most capital.
 
d) Lars and Mona because they contributed the least amount of capital.
 

16. CC’s Day Spa, LLC, is a member-managed limited liability company. So long as it is in accordance with state law, and unless the members previously agreed otherwise, voting rights will be apportioned according to:
 
a) Participation in management.
 
b) Capital contributions.
 
c) The number of members.
 
d) Each individual transaction of the LLC, and will vary with each transaction.
 
17. Jim and Kiley are architects and members of JK, PC, a professional corporation. Jim and Kiley supervise Luc, an employee of JK. As a member of JK, Jim and Kiley
 
a) Are personally liable for any/all tort(s) committed by Kiley.
 
b) May be personally liable for malpractice committed by Luc working within the scope of his job at JK.
 
c) Has limited liability for any of Kiley’s acts of malpractice.
 
d) Has no liability for any torts committed by Luc.:
 
18. Kisha operates River Valley Soccer, an athletic equipment shop as a sole proprietorship. Taxes on the business’s income are paid by
 
a) No one; since it is a sole proprietorship there are no business taxes.
 
b) Kisha as the sole owner.
 
c) The state or federal government if Kisha holds a Small Business Administration loan acquired to start her business.
 
d) The business entity of River Valley Soccer, not Kisha personally.
 
19. Assume that Virginia enacted a law prohibiting, until further notice, all grocery stores in Virginia from selling all powdered spices manufactured in, or shipped from, Maryland. This law was enacted because it was discovered that the spices recently manufactured in Maryland were infected with bacteria. Determine the constitutionality of the Virginia statute. The statute is:
 
a) Unconstitutional; it violates grocery store owners’ substantive and procedural due process rights under the 5th and 14th Amendments because they are private businesses.
 
b) Unconstitutional; the statute imposes an undue burden on interstate commerce.
 
c) Constitutional; it is a valid exercise of Virginia’s police power.
 
d) Constitutional; the statute imposes an undue burden on intrastate and interstate commerce.
 
20. Distinguish which of the following is an advantage of limited liability companies (LLCs) over corporations.
 
a) Only one member of a LLC must have unlimited liability as compared with corporations in which all shareholders have unlimited liability.
 
b) LLCs can be formed without any specific steps being taken by the owners as compared with corporations that must file Articles of Incorporation with the State.
 
c) In most cases, a LLC can choose whether to be taxed as a partnership or corporation, as compared with corporations that are subject to double corporate taxation.
 
d) LLCs can choose whether to sell shares publically to investors, as compared to private corporations that must sell shares publically to investors.
 

21. Pete, who collects antique cars, hired Ann as his agent to find and purchase a 1965 Ford Mustang on his behalf. Ann found a Mustang like Pete wanted, but Ann fell in love with the car and purchased it for herself.
Which of the following illustrates Ann’s liability, if any, in her duty as agent to Pete in this situation?
 
a) Ann has not violated the duty of loyalty to Pete; she can find another Mustang for him.
 
b) Ann has not engaged in self-dealing because she did not purchase the Mustang with Pete’s funds.
 
c) Ann usurped an opportunity for Pete, but has not violated the duty of loyalty to Pete by competing with Pete’s interests.
 
d) Ann violated the duty of loyalty to Pete by competing with Pete’s interests, and has usurped an opportunity for Pete.
 
22. Ed hired Frankie, who is 13 years old, to buy a computer on Ed’s behalf. Which of the following identifies the legal relationship between Ed and Frankie?
 
a) This is a valid agency relationship even though Frankie is a minor, and Ed would be bound by authorized contracts Frankie enters into on Ed’s behalf.
 
b) This is a valid agency
relationship even though Frankie is a minor, but Ed would have the option of disaffirming any contracts Frankie enters into on Ed’s behalf.
 
c) This is a valid agency relationship even though Frankie is a minor, but Frankie would not be entitled to any payment under the terms of the agency because he is a minor.
 
d) This is an invalid agency relationship because Frankie is a minor.

23. Mediation might be more reasonable and appropriate than a trial in which of the following situations?
 
a) A lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a new state statute.
 
b) A dispute between neighbors over a property boundary.
 
c) An alleged theft of patio furniture from the patio of a house.
 
d) None of the above are appropriate for mediation.
 
24. Jones wants to sue Windell Hotels, Inc. in federal court for $450,000 to recover all his medical expenses in Mexico and the US; for $50,000 for the cost of the plane trip from Mexico to Arizona, the 2 plane seats and ambulance costs in various airports; $10,000 for 8 weeks of lost wages; and $50,000 for pain and suffering resulting from the injury. Can he sue in federal court?
 
a) Yes, because Federal Court always has jurisdiction over citizens of different states.
 
b) No, because Federal Court does not have jurisdiction in cases that do not involve federal laws.
 
c) Yes, because the Federal Court may have jurisdiction over citizens of different states and the lawsuit involves damages greater than $75,000.
 
d) No, because the Federal Court has no jurisdiction over an accident that occurred in Mexico.
 
25. It would be easier for Jones to bring the lawsuit in Arizona state court, but he wonders if the court can get Windell Hotels to come to Arizona. Can the Arizona state court impose jurisdiction over Windell Hotels to bring the company to court in Arizona?
 
a) No, because the subject of the lawsuit took place in a foreign country.
 
b) No, because the corporation does not have sufficient minimum contact with Arizona to allow the Arizona court to use the long arm statute to establish jurisdiction in Arizona.
 
c) Yes, because the Jones is a resident of Arizona and he is the plaintiff in the lawsuit.
 
d) Yes, because Windell Hotels has sufficient minimum contact with Arizona the state to justify the court’s use of the long arm statute.
 

Product Code :Law02

To get answer for this question, kindly click here (Note: Don’t forget to write the product code in comment section)

You can also email us at assignmentconsultancy.help@gmail.com but please mentioned product code in the mail body while sending emails.You can browse more questions to get answer in our Q&A sections here.