Philosophy-QA109 online

Philosophy-QA109 Online Services

Answer the following questions, Be sure to number your answers, so they correspond with the questions.
Each answer to each question should be at least one paragraph or more. Answers may come from only two sources, your textbook (Powerful Ideas: An Introduction to Philosophy, 2nd edition) and your mind. No work should be submitted from the Internet or other sources. See the sample in Getting Started for an example of what is required.

Be sure to use standard English grammar and spelling.

1. Explain some of the benefits a student may gain by studying philosophy.
2. Explain the Socratic Method of Teaching. Is this a useful way for students to learn?

3. Explain how critical thinking can be used to analyze a philosophical issue.
4. Compare and contrast induction, abduction, and deduction.

5. Explain some of the different areas of philosophy which will be discussed in this course.
6. Compare and contrast various views on substance such as materialism, dualism, and idealism.

7. Evaluate the 4 views as to the nature of universals and particulars.
8. Explain and evaluate the views of Anaximander regarding the nature of substance.

9. Explain and evaluate the views of Pythagoras regarding the nature of substance.
10. Explain Aristotle’s 4 causes.

11. Compare and contrast rationalism and empiricism.
12. Explain the difference between A priori and A posteriori knowledge.

13. Compare and contrast Foundationalism and Coherencies.
14. Compare and contrast pragmatic theories of truth with the correspondence theory of truth.

15. What are some of the implications of Gödel’s Theorem?
16.For a moment assume that Descartes’ argument works in proving God’s existence, does the ultimate conclusion follow as stated in premise 6? Can Descartes be certain that God would not allow an evil demon or computer to systematically deceive humanity? Maybe God has a reason or needs to teach humanity a lesson. To get full credit for this post, you must address the prompt(s) fully (write a paragraph).

You can read more about our case study assignment help services here.

How it Works

How It works ?

Step 1:- Click on Submit your Assignment here or shown in left side corner of every page and fill the quotation form with all the details. In the comment section, please mention Case Id mentioned in end of every Q&A Page. You can also send us your details through our email id support@assignmentconsultancy.com with Case Id in the email body. Case Id is essential to locate your questions so please mentioned that in your email or submit your quotes form comment section.

Step 2:- While filling submit your quotes form please fill all details like deadline date, expected budget, topic , your comments in addition to Case Id . The date is asked to provide deadline.

Step 3:- Once we received your assignments through submit your quotes form or email, we will review the Questions and notify our price through our email id. Kindly ensure that our email id assignmentconsultancy.help@gmail.com and support@assignmentconcultancy.com must not go into your spam folders. We request you to provide your expected budget as it will help us in negotiating with our experts.

Step 4:- Once you agreed with our price, kindly pay by clicking on Pay Now and please ensure that while entering your credit card details for making payment, it must be done correctly and address should be your credit card billing address. You can also request for invoice to our live chat representatives.

Step 5:- Once we received the payment we will notify through our email and will deliver the Q&A solution through mail as per agreed upon deadline.

Step 6:-You can also call us in our phone no. as given in the top of the home page or chat with our customer service representatives by clicking on chat now given in the bottom right corner.

Case Approach

Scientific Methodology

We use best scientific approach to solve case study as recommended and designed by best professors and experts in the World. The approach followed by our experts are given below:

Defining Problem

The first step in solving any case study analysis is to define its problem carefully. In order to do this step, our experts read the case two three times so as to define problem carefully and accurately. This step acts as a base and help in building the structure in next steps.

Structure Definition

The second step is to define structure to solve the case. Different cases has different requirements and so as the structure. Our experts understand this and follow student;s university guidelines to come out with best structure so that student will receive best mark for the same.

Research and Analysis

This is the most important step which actually defines the strength of any case analysis. In order to provide best case analysis, our experts not only refer case materials but also outside materials if required to come out with best analysis for the case.

Conclusion & Recommendations

A weak conclusion or recommendations spoil the entire case analysis. Our expert know this and always provide good chunks of volume for this part so that instructors will see the effort put by students in arriving at solution so as to provide best mark.

Related Services

Answer the following questions, Be sure to number your answers, so they correspond with the questions.Each answer to each question should be at least one paragraph or more. Answers may come from only two sources, your textbook (Powerful Ideas: An Introduction to Philosophy, 2nd edition) and your mind. No work should be submitted from the Internet or other sources. See the sample in Getting

Started for an example of what is required.

Be sure to use standard English grammar and spelling.

1. Compare, contrast, and evaluate the views of John Searle and Rene Descartes on dualism.
2. Compare, contrast, and evaluate the views of George Berkeley and Thomas Hobbes on the mind.

3. Explain and evaluate what David Hume means by saying that we have no evidence of the self.
4. How is Hume’s view of the mind related to that of the Tibetan Master Milarepa’s on this subject?

5. Explain, compare, and contrast the views of Anselm and Gaunilo regarding the Ontological argument.
6. Explain, contrast, and evaluate the views of Freud and Nietzsche, on the rationality of religious belief.

7. Explain, compare, and evaluate the views of Tolstoy and Kierkegaard, on the rationality of religious belief.
8. Explain and evaluate Pascal’s Wager. Would belief based on such an argument get you into heaven?

9. Explain and evaluate William Paley’s version of the design argument. Does the argument provide a rational basis for belief in some sort of creative intelligence behind the universe and life?

10. Explain and evaluate the problem of evil.
11. Compare and contrast the main tenets of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Taoism.

12. Explain in detail the connection between the Tao, Ying, and Yang.
13. Articulate how principles of Taoism serve as the foundation of the art of Feng Shui.

14. Explain and evaluate the views of Sogyal Rinpoche regarding death and human activity in the modern world ( from the readings at the end of chapter 6).
15. Consider and explain the evidence for reincarnation and the experience of other levels of reality presented in the chapter.

16.Can we know if we have a soul? What about other people or animals?To get full credit for this post, you must address the prompt(s) fully (write a paragraph).

Answer the following questions, Be sure to number your answers, so they correspond with the questions.

Each answer to each question should be at least one paragraph or more. Answers may come from only two sources, your textbook (Powerful Ideas: An Introduction to Philosophy, 2nd edition) and your mind. No work should be submitted from the Internet or other sources. See the sample in Getting Started for an example of what is required.

Be sure to use standard English grammar and spelling.

1. If a computer app beats you every time you play chess, is the computer smarter than you? Does your computer think? Explain why or why not in detail.
2. Is free will possible if there is such a thing as God’s plan? Explain how humans can be free if a higher power knows what you are going to do before you do it.

3. Explain and evaluate the paradox of Burden’s donkey and what Spinoza’s view and use of this paradox.
4. Explain in detail in what sense does Aloha Karamazov realize that he is free in Dostoyevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov.

5. Explain in detail why many existentialists such as Dostoyevsky and Sartre feel that human beings are outside determinism?
6. Explain the idea of analytic philosophy and contrast with other schools of philosophy.

7. Compare and contrast the logical positivist to the natural language theorist.
8. Explain the role of the “Vienna Circle” in the history of analytic philosophy.

9. Explain and evaluate the main themes found in existentialism. Does our being truly precede our essence?
10. Explain why Kierkegaard and Dostoyevsky are considered predecessors of existentialism.

11. Critically analyze Husserl’s phenomenology and how it informed existentialism?
12. Explain the meaning of being and nothingness according to Sartre.

13. Discuss the concept of absurdity in Albert Camus’ philosophy.To get full credit for this post, you must address the prompt(s) fully (write a paragraph).

Be sure to use standard English grammar and spelling.

1. Explain the connections between pleasure, contemplation, and judgment in aesthetic appreciation.
2. Explain how aesthetics, art, and criticism are interrelated.

3. Evaluate David Hume’s view regarding art criticism.
4. Articulate the notion of ‘truth’ in art criticism.

5. Explain if it is possible to have an agreement about aesthetic judgments and if that is a problem.
6. Explain the elements of any moral dilemma: the act, the consequences of the act, and the moral agent.

7. Critically analyze the false starts in moral philosophy including relativism and Divine Command.
8. Discuss the practical and logical problems with Aquinas’ Natural Law moral theory.

9. Explain how ethics can be said to be always personal and often political.
10. Compare and contrast various views of Hobbes and Locke on the state of nature and natural rights.

11. Explain and evaluate Rousseau’s criticism of both Hobbes and Locke regarding the state of nature.
12. Explain the difference between the labor theory of property and labor theory of value.

13. Explain and evaluate Karl Marx’s analysis of class struggle as presented in his Communist Manifesto.
14. Explain the views of Natick and Hospers regarding legitimate laws and the role of government.

15. Compare and contrast Rawls and Natick on justice.
16. Does knowing the personal, social, or political context of a work of art has a bearing on how to judge the art in question? Give examples from

painting or sculpture literature, and theater, television or film.
To get full credit for this post, you must address the prompt(s) fully (write a paragraph).

Product code: Philosophy-QA109

Looking for best Philosophy-QA109 online,please click here

Summary